Journals
Publications
- 2022: Oren et al., New phylum names harmonize prokaryotic nomenclature
- doi:10.1128/mbio.01479-22
- 2022: Oren et al., ICSP response to ‘Regulating access can restrict participation in reporting new species and taxa’
- 2022: Sutcliffe et al. ICSP Response to ‘Science depends on nomenclature, but nomenclature is not science’
- 2021: On. Current status future perspectives of taxonomic subcommittees of the ICSP
- 2021: Oren et al. Public discussion on a proposed revision of the ICNP
- 2021: Oren et al. Emendation of the ICNP to resolve the status of Cyanobacteria in prokaryotic nomenclature
- 2021: Oren et al. Emendation of the ICNP to include the rank of phylum
doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004851
- 2021: Oren et al. The IJSEM moves to ‘true continuous publication’ at the beginning of 2021
- 2021: Oren et al. Preparing a revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes
- 2020: Tindall. Access regulations to genetic resources and deposit of nomenclatural types under the ICNP
- 2020: Parte et al. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ
- 2020: Murray et al. Roadmap for naming uncultivated Archaea and Bacteria
doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0733-x
- 2020: Arahal. Opinions 100, 101 and 102
- 2020: Arahal. Opinions 97, 98 and 99
- 2020: Albuquergue & Rainey. In memorian – Milton Simões da Costa (1948-2020)
- 2019: Parker et al. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes: Prokaryotic Code (2008 Revision)
- 2018: Chun et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for taxonomy of prokaryotes
- 2017: Kostantinidis et al. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy
- 2010: Tindall et al. Notes on the characterisation of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes
- 2006: Tindall et al. Valid publication of names of prokaryotes according to the rules of nomenclature
- 2005: Rosselló-Móra. Updating Prokaryotic Taxonomy
doi: 10.1128/JB.187.18.6255-6257.2005
- 2005: Kostantinidis & Tiedje. Towards a Genome-Based Taxonomy for Prokaryotes
doi: 10.1128/JB.187.18.6258–6264.2005
- 1999: Tindall. Misunderstanding the Bacteriological Code
doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-3-1313
- 1999: Tindall. Proposals to update and make changes to the Bacteriological Code
doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-3-1309
- 1998: Stackebrandt. Editorial – The IJSB Explores New Shores Download PDF
- 1996: Murray. A Rule about the depositon of Type strains
doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-3-831
- 1995: Murray & Stackebrandt. Provisional status Candidatus for incompletely described prokaryotes
doi: 10.1099/00207713-45-1-186
- 1995: The potential of dead bacterial specimens for systematic studies
doi: 10.1099/00207713-45-1-188
- 1992: Lapage et al. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria: Bacteriological Code, 1990 Revision
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8817/
- 1987: Wayne et al. Report on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics
doi: 10.1099/00207713-37-4-463
- 1980: Skerman et al. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names
doi: 10.1099/00207713-30-1-225
- 1966: Editorial Board of the Judicial Commission of the ICNB. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria
doi: 10.1099/00207713-16-4-459
- 1951: International Bulletin. Designation of Nomenclatural Types of Taxonomic Groups
- 1951: Breed et al. The Subcommittees of the International Committees on Bacteriological Nomenclature
- 1951: Buchanan et al. Authorization of a Committee on Bacteriological Nomenclature and of a Judicial Commission
- 1951: The Editorial Board. International Bulletin of Bacteriological Nomenclature and Taxonomy
- 1948: Buchanan et al. International Bacteriological Code of Nomenclature
doi: 10.1128/jb.55.3.287-306.1948
- 1920: Winslow et al. The Families and Genera of the Bacteria
doi: 10.1128/jb.5.3.191-229.1920
- 1917: Winslow et al. The Families and Genera of the Bacteria;